• Home
  • Print
  • Forum
  • Archive
    • Volume 97
    • Volume 96
    • Volume 95
    • Volume 94
    • Volume 93
    • Volume 92
    • Volume 91
    • Volume 90
    • Volume 89
    • Volume 88
    • Volume 87
    • Volume 86
    • Volume 85
    • Volume 84
    • Volume 83
    • Volume 82
    • Volume 81
    • Volume 80
    • Volume 79
    • Volume 78
    • Volume 77
    • Volume 76
    • Volume 75
    • Volume 74
    • Volume 73
  • About
    • Mission & History
    • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
    • Current Members & Editors
    • Prospective Members
    • Subscribe
    • Contact

Recent Posts

  • Silence for the Sake of “Security”: BOP Regulations Stifle Incarcerated Journalism in Federal Prisons January 5, 2026
  • Clerk Unprotected: The Gendered Pipeline to Supreme Court Clerkships January 5, 2026
  • Aggregation at the Bottom January 5, 2026
  • The Indelible Flaws of Conviction Integrity Units January 5, 2026
  • Assuming Accent: Recognizing the Intersection of Race and National Origin in Title VII Discrimination January 5, 2026

Recent Comments

  • 7-4 Discussion: Historical Complexity Reflect – Homework Writing Bay on A Deliberative Democratic Theory of Precedent
  • Homepage on Toward Sustainable Recreation on Colorado’s Fourteeners
  • Biden’s judicial appointees in Colorado make their mark | Courts | coloradopolitics.com | Persistent Billing on Biden, Bennet, and Bipartisan Federal Judicial Selection
  • Alabama Death Penalty Case Reveals Clarence Thomas’s Cruelty | Austin Sarat | Verdict - flyingtownight on Bucklew v. Precythe and the Resurgence of the Method of Execution Challenge
  • Who Is Possibility Taking For? Banking within the Shadow of SVB - Future Wealth Investors on The Tailors of Wall Street

Archives

  • January 2026
  • September 2025
  • June 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • January 2025
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • January 2024
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • January 2023
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • April 2019
  • March 2018
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Categories

  • Forum
  • Issue 1
  • Issue 1
  • Issue 1
  • Issue 1
  • Issue 1
  • Issue 1
  • Issue 1
  • Issue 2
  • Issue 2
  • Issue 2
  • Issue 2
  • Issue 2
  • Issue 2
  • Issue 2
  • Issue 3
  • Issue 3
  • Issue 3
  • Issue 3
  • Issue 3
  • Issue 3
  • Issue 4
  • Issue 4
  • Issue 4
  • Issue 4
  • Issue 4
  • Issue 4
  • Issue 4
  • Print
  • Volume 88
  • Volume 91
  • Volume 92
  • Volume 93
  • Volume 94
  • Volume 95
  • Volume 96
  • Volume 97
Skip to content
University of Colorado
  • Home
  • Print
  • Forum
  • Archive
    • Volume 97
    • Volume 96
    • Volume 95
    • Volume 94
    • Volume 93
    • Volume 92
    • Volume 91
    • Volume 90
    • Volume 89
    • Volume 88
    • Volume 87
    • Volume 86
    • Volume 85
    • Volume 84
    • Volume 83
    • Volume 82
    • Volume 81
    • Volume 80
    • Volume 79
    • Volume 78
    • Volume 77
    • Volume 76
    • Volume 75
    • Volume 74
    • Volume 73
  • About
    • Mission & History
    • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
    • Current Members & Editors
    • Prospective Members
    • Subscribe
    • Contact

Category: Volume 88

The Law Review Article

by Pierre SchlagForum, Issue 4, Volume 88Posted on June 16, 2017November 25, 2020No Comments

What is a law review article? Does America know? How might we help America in this regard? Here, we approach the first question on the bias: As we have found, …

Read more “The Law Review Article”

Bob Nagel and the Emptiness of Supreme Court Standards of Review

by Larry AlexanderForum, Issue 2, Volume 88Posted on March 12, 2017November 25, 2020No Comments

Bob Nagel is a well-known and persistent critic of Supreme Court decision making—and in particular, the Court’s stated formulae for how those decisions are reached. Bob’s neologism, “the formulaic Constitution,” …

Read more “Bob Nagel and the Emptiness of Supreme Court Standards of Review”

Social Media

  • Scholastica
  • LinkedIn
  • X (Formerly Twitter)
Copyright © 2026 University of Colorado Inspiro Theme by WPZOOM